Posts Tagged ‘amazon’

Kindle FreeTime gives relatives peace

Friday, February 7th, 2014


No comments posted. ||
| Search Archives

Saturday, Jan 18, 2014 2:05 PM EST

Kindle FreeTime gives kin assent

This undated print supposing by Amazon shows a Kindle FreeTime app displayed on a Kindle Fire HDX. Inc.ís Kindle FreeTime gives kin an easy approach to retard grown-up content. With FreeTime, kids get thousands of kid-friendly books, games and videos for a monthly fee. (AP Photo/Amazon)

It’s no tip that kids adore tablets, yet a inclination also can get them into trouble.

By a time my daughter incited 3, she knew how to lift adult “Sesame Street” clips on YouTube and corkscrew by photos of friends and relatives. Although that giveaway party was impossibly useful during times, there also were times she managed to post aged cinema to Facebook or watch an inapt movie. Inc.’s Kindle FreeTime gives kin an easy approach to retard grown-up content. Kindles aren’t alone in charity parental controls, yet FreeTime goes serve with an discretionary subscription service. With that, we get thousands of kid-friendly books, games and videos for a monthly fee. The peculiarity is mixed, yet a use is hassle-free, protected and comparatively inexpensive — starting during $3 a month.

It works usually with a 2012 and after models of a Kindle Fire.


All Kindle Fires come with Kindle FreeTime already installed. The app itself is giveaway to use. Once opened, all calm not placed in your child’s FreeTime comment is blocked. That means no entrance to Facebook, YouTube or Netflix, if we don’t wish your child to have it. You need a cue to exit FreeTime.

You can also extent your child’s shade time by carrying entrance close off after a specified volume of time. You can even mention how many of a certain kind of media your child can view. For example, we can give a child total entrance to books, while tying video and app use to 30 mins each.

Different time boundary can be set for weekdays and weekends, and “curfews” can be set to keep kids from personification games after bedtime.

You can also need kids to review or use educational apps for a certain volume of time before unlocking other content.


Again, a FreeTime app is free. Where we have to compensate is to entrance Amazon’s FreeTime Unlimited service.

Geared toward children ages 3 to 8, FreeTime Unlimited allows kids to download anything they wish from a vast library of kid-friendly apps, books and videos, mostly yet a assistance of an adult. It also suggests calm that they competence like formed on what they’ve already downloaded. Parents get to travel divided and not worry about what they’re adult to.

But a suggestions are formed on what’s already stored in your child’s account. we wish a app did a improved pursuit during filtering calm formed on a child’s age. My daughter, now 4, doesn’t need to be examination Batman cartoons or personification “Plants vs. Zombies.”

Amazon touts a service’s “all-you-can-eat” pricing, observant that it eliminates a need to negotiate with your kids what and how many calm you’re peaceful to compensate for. It also helps with buyer’s remorse. If your kids don’t find a book or app quite entertaining, only undo it and let them find something else. Plus, it protects your wallet from kids who competence not know they’re spending genuine income on practical toys.

Another plus: It strips out promotion enclosed in other versions of a apps.

A single-child membership costs $3 per month for Amazon Prime members and $5 for others. If we wish to set adult apart profiles for mixed children, we can opt for a family membership, that costs $7 per month with Amazon Prime, or $10 without.

Although FreeTime Unlimited isn’t as discerning as some of a apps on a family iPad, it didn’t take prolonged for my daughter to figure out how to download books and apps on her own. She combined so many calm that it ate adult all of a storage on my differently mostly dull Kindle Fire.

In further to being orderly by form of media, a calm is also indexed by character. My daughter can’t review a difference “Apps,” “Books,” and “Video” yet, yet she knows accurately who Elmo, Sponge Bob and Curious George are. FreeTime Unlimited creates it easy for her to find and download calm featuring them.

The icons also are sincerely large, that helps kids with tiny hands. The series of icons displayed on a shade can still be dizzying, that can make it tough for both children and adults to find what they’re looking for. There’s a hunt function, yet many immature kids would need an adult’s assistance for that.



Although many immature kids aren’t sold when it comes to books and TV, we was unhappy by a peculiarity of a offerings.

According to Amazon, some-more than half of a calm accessible by a use is “educational.” Indeed, there were design books by important children’s authors such as Eric Carle and Chris Van Allsburg. But many of a books focused on TV characters such as Sponge Bob, Dora a Explorer and Scooby Doo — not accurately classical children’s literature.

The videos enclosed a lot of Nickelodeon and PBS shows now renouned with tiny children. we conclude a inclusion of classical “Sesame Street” and “Reading Rainbow” episodes we desired as kid.

The same videos are already offering giveaway to Amazon Prime members, though. You don’t need FreeTime Unlimited, or even a Kindle, to watch them.

You do need FreeTime Unlimited and a Kindle Fire for a books and a apps.

For me, $3 a month is a tiny cost to compensate to keep my daughter’s comment pressed with calm she likes, so she won’t notice that she can’t entrance potentially problem-causing apps such as YouTube and Netflix. The assent of mind that comes from meaningful that she’s is not examination a zombie play “The Walking Dead” is priceless.


Bree Fowler can be reached during

Follow Us

Post a reader comment

We inspire your feedback and dialog.
Please be polite and respectful.
If you’re witty, to a indicate and quotable, your reader comments might also be enclosed on a Around a Towns page of The Sunday Republican.
Registered users comments will be posted automatically.
All other comments will be reviewed by a staff before appearing on a Web site.
Click Here to register.


Article source:

Can cloud computing revitalise IT dinosaurs?

Monday, February 3rd, 2014

What do IBM, Dell, HP, Oracle and SAP have in common?

All are mature record companies – a youngest is Dell shaped in 1984 – and they all banking on cloud computing removing them out of a doldrums.

There are a few things wrong with that idea.

First, it was cloud computing that got them into difficulty in a initial place. Hardware sales, quite servers, fell as companies switched applications and estimate to a cloud.

Cloud hosted applications interrupt high-end software. It hurdles high-margins, undermines a need for infrastructure and support than allows program giants to get divided with outrageous costs.

Oracle, creatively a program association though given shopping Sun Microsystems with a vast hardware business, is in a some-more nuanced position. It mislaid server sales to cloud computing while a program business is challenged by nimble, commoditised cloud-based apps. SAP faces only a app challenge.

Second, the aged propagandize companies have enjoyed comparatively high margins in during slightest tools of their businesses. Even Dell’s commodity hardware margins were aloft than a wafer skinny margins Amazon squeezes from a IaaS – infrastructure as a use – business.

Amazon creates income since of scale. Huge scale. According to Gartner, a association has 5 times a IaaS ability of a subsequent 14 competitors combined together.

The economics of scale meant any additional patron is cheaper to offer and perfect marketplace distance cuts a cost of appropriation customers.

Amazon’s scale means it sits straddle a cloud marketplace like a colossus.

Third, Amazon has a outrageous first-mover advantage. That’s always a problem when any new record comes along. It’s a bigger problem than common with a cloud where being initial means being prepared to accommodate direct while others are still building capacity.

It means training how to make assets – Amazon has forsaken cloud prices 40-odd times in 8 years of operation.  Do IBM, Oracle and SAP unequivocally wish to follow Amazon down that path?

It also scores since it doesn’t have any legacy. There’s no existent business or patron contracts to protect. Apart from anything else, this means Amazon is discerning to innovate, there’s zero to remove from relocating fast. And that’s frightful for competitors.

None of a would-be cloud giants can pierce though pain. In many cases a pain involves converting high-value, high-margin products and services into commodities. There’s no trail around this, though it will make it harder for them to punch a bullet.

Fourth, Cloud computing leaves small room for differentiation.  IBM, Oracle, HP and SAP all consider they can supplement value, maybe they can do a small around a edges, though on a whole,  customers aren’t peaceful to compensate for it when a alternatives are roughly as sophisticated, though an sequence of bulk cheaper.

To sum up: The large IT companies have small choice to conduct to a cloud, their business are going there with or though them.

Whether they can say patron relationships, supplement value and continue to pullulate is distant from given. You’d have to collect that one or some-more of a brands, IBM, Dell, Oracle, HP and SAP, isn’t going to make a transition.

[digitl 2014]

digitl on Google+

The post Can cloud computing revitalise IT dinosaurs? seemed initial on digitl.

Article source:

Larry Ellison: Amazon, Are Now Oracle’s Biggest Competitors

Thursday, January 30th, 2014

Larry Ellison


Oracle CEO Larry Ellison

See Also

CEO Larry Ellison has seen Oracle’s destiny and a name is cloud.

That’s a summary he gave yesterday during a keynote debate in San Francisco in an eventuality to foster Oracle’s tellurian resources cloud.

With that, he announced that his biggest aspirant in a hardware marketplace “used to be IBM, now we consider it’s Amazon,” he pronounced on stage. As PC World’s James Niccolai reports, he also said:

“Our competitors are this whole new era of cloud companies. We’re focused on a infrastructure companies like Amazon and a SaaS companies like Salesforce …

“We only substituted a garland of large guys—IBM and SAP—for a garland of other guys; tiny though agile.”

The concentration on a cloud is understandable. All a hulk craving IT companies are doing a same – HP, Dell, Cisco, VMware, etc. – since cloud promises to be a huge, uninformed area of expansion as enterprises buy some-more of their IT needs as a monthly use delivered over a Internet instead of shopping program and hardware and building it all in-house themselves.

Enterprise spending on a form of cloud computing that Amazon offers is now flourishing by 36% a year. This will be a $20 billion marketplace by a finish of 2016, the 451 Group Reports.

Oracle won’t shake IBM off a tail that easily. IBM has also vowed to squeeze a cloud computing marketplace divided from Amazon and is gunning to spin cloud computing into a $7 billion business for itself by a finish of 2015.

Disclosure: Jeff Bezos is an financier in Business Insider by his personal investment association Bezos Expeditions.

Article source:

Handful of Cloud Miracles for 2014

Thursday, December 26th, 2013

NEW YORK (TheStreet) — The large cloud computing title is that we might shortly stop regulating a term. Cloud has turn a mainstream of computing, only as e-commerce has turn a mainstream of commerce.

Cloud is not an option. Virtual handling systems and gigantic scaling, a “barbell” in that a high-end hosts and hand-held device makers vanquish a computing center category — that’s a existence for businesses and investors.

The doubt for 2014 is how many open clouds will tarry a entrance shakeout.’s (AMZN) infamous cost fight plan has given a world’s dominiant online tradesman many of a market, so Google (GOOG) and Microsoft (MSFT) have had to compare prices and features. IBM (IBM) is earnest “big things” for early subsequent year, though it’s misleading either Big Blue can supplement any new facilities to make many of a difference.

If IBM can’t make a hole in Amazon’s lead, what are a chances for success for Hewlett-Packard (HPQ), ATT (T), Verizon (VZ), CenturyLink (CTL) or Rackspace (RAX)? With Amazon’s infrastructure complement apropos an attention standard, same goes for VMware (VMW), Citrix (CTXS) and RedHat (RHT)?

Most of these comkpetitors will be forced to find some retreat in a “private cloud.” Private cloud is like desktop Linux or a Cowboys Super Bowl win: They provoke it though it never seems to happen. Cloud costs many some-more to build than to buy, so many don’t.

Because renting cloud is so cheap, many enterprises are relocating pivotal applications to “faux cloud” systems run by Salesforce.Com (CRM), NetSuite (N) or even Oracle (ORCL), formed on Oracle’s exclusive services and databases.

There are savings, a program all updates together, it’s a same inventory, patron government or tellurian family complement as before, so because build a private cloud?

Can China change this equillibrium? Amazon is already going into China. Can fear of a National Security Agency? Some countries will join Switzerland in perfectionist internal hosting of internal data. But will it make a difference?

Cloud was filled with acronyms. IaaS — Infrastructure as a Service. That’s a simple cloud record has been selling. PaaS — Platform as a Service. That adds a languages and collection we need to emanate Software as a Service (SaaS). SaaS is what we get when we use PaaS on an IaaS.

Article source:

Amazon Reports no ‘Snowden Effect’ as AWS Goes From Strength to Strength

Wednesday, December 18th, 2013

Amazon’s cloud computing services have not been impacted during all by Snowden’s revelations notwithstanding reports to a contrary.

Amazon says a cloud computing service, AWS, has not been impacted during all by a revelations about widespread supervision espionage on adults data.

Amazon Web Services (AWS), that has only announced a vital enlargement into China for 2014, has pronounced that notwithstanding countless reports to a contrary, a revelations about widespread supervision espionage of adults around a universe has not impacted on a business – during all.

This is according to Iain Gavin, handling executive of AWS in a UK and Ireland, who spoke to IBTimes UK this week. Gavin pronounced he and his group had seen positively no greeting from among their customers, notwithstanding widespread reports that a cloud computing attention was set to take a vast strike following revelations that a NSA and GCHQ had gained unobstructed entrance to patron information hold by companies like Facebook, Google and Apple.

Back in Nov Daniel Castro, a comparison researcher during a Information Technology Innovation Foundation in Washington, warned that a Snowden revelations were formulating a conditions that could irrevocably change a approach a internet works, definition vast problems for cloud computing companies as countries looked to emanate laws to keep data in-country:

“What this would meant is that any multinational association unexpected has lots of additional costs. The advantages of cloud computing that have given us flexibility, scalability and reduced costs – generally for vast amounts of information – would unexpected disappear.”

Big business

But Gavin doesn’t trust there is any imminent doom, and pronounced that internally during Amazon, many trust that AWS will turn Amazon’s categorical business in years to come, holding over from a sell business as a many critical arm of a Everything Store.

Launched in 2006 when cloud computing was something many people had never even listened of and PRISM was nonetheless a wink int he NSA’s eye, Amazon Web Services is now adding adequate new server ability each singular day to support what would have been Amazon’s whole tellurian infrastructure when it had annual income of $7 billion– that is all a approach behind in 2004.

Amazon S3, a company’s storage service, now binds trillions of objects and frequently peaks during some-more than 1.5 million exchange each second.

The launch of AWS in 2006 altered a approach companies suspicion about computing and storage infrastructure. No longer were companies forced to deposit outrageous sums of income in servers and PCs that would turn archaic in 18 months – computing had turn a billable service.

High volume/low margin

Amazon’s passionate foudner and CEO Jeff Bezos, always operated his business on a high volume/low domain basement and AWS is no different. Because Amazon had a ability to scale a services to accommodate demand, it could offer a business reduce and reduce prices (it has forsaken prices 37 times given 2006), and that, according to Gavin will continue.

But a UK arch says that “cost saving is a delegate benefit” for his customers, and it is a “agility and flexibility” that AWS offers that is a categorical pull for those looking to use a service.

Adding to this coherence is a further of new facilities to AWS. while it started solemnly with only 9 new facilities combined in 2007, to date in 2013 Amazon has combined 244 new services with Gavin claiming that creation is partial of a “fundamental DNA” of Amazon.

$50bn business

The association does not mangle out income total for a AWS business unit, though a news from Macquarie Capital in Jan estimated that Amazon’s cloud computing multiplication would move in $4bn in 2013, rising to over $9bn by 2015, that could see a business valued during over $50 billion.

So notwithstanding a all a reports of a imminent genocide of a cloud following this year’s espionage revelations, on a belligerent it seems there is no change with Amazon business happy to entrust their information to a cloud and a insurance and remoteness standards that Amazon has in place.

The enlargement into China in 2014 will see AWS services, that are served from datacentres widespread via a world, being accessible from 10 regions globally.

Article source:

AWS C3 necessity signals lust for cloud computing performance

Wednesday, December 18th, 2013

Amazon Web Services Inc. awaits new shipments of hardware for a recently launched C3 instances
as a direct for cloud computing opening in a Elastic Compute Cloud exceeds supply.

The critical takeaway here is a lust for opening on

Carl Brooks,
analyst, 451 Research

The necessity was initial remarkable in a blog post
last week by Amazon Web Services’ (AWS) arch evangelist, Jeff Barr, who wrote that it took just
two weeks for C3 use in a Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) to surpass a turn that a former
fastest-growing instance form achieved in 22 weeks.

“The critical takeaway here is a lust for opening on AWS,” pronounced Carl Brooks, analyst
with Boston-based 451 Research.

The new C3 instances were suggested during a AWS
re:Invent conference
this year. They yield faster processors formed on Intel Corp.’s 2.8 GHz
E5-2680 chronicle 2 “Ivy
” technology, double a memory per vCPU of a prior C1 and CC2
lines of instances, as good as solid-state-drive-based instance storage. A c3.large instance, the
smallest in a line, offers 3.75 GB of RAM with dual vCPUs and dual 16 GB solid-state
for an on-demand cost of 15 cents per hour.

I/O opening has historically been an emanate for IT pros regulating EC2, to that Amazon responded
with a ability to squeeze provisioned
for EC2 instances connected to Elastic
Block Store
. Even with provisioned IOPS, however, AWS business still understand a EC2 cloud’s
performance as disproportionate and theme to “noisy
” problems, that Amazon denies.

Cloud opening still lags behind bare-metal

Amazon’s not alone in perplexing to ramp adult a cloud’s performance.

Raw computing energy has been during a forefront of cloud computing foe lately, as
indicated by new information core overhauls by Verizon
and Rackspace
, pronounced John Treadway, comparison clamp boss during Cloud Technology Partners Inc., a
Boston-based cloud consulting firm.

“Amazon’s not going to lay still; they’re responding [to competition] and substantially saying a good
latent marketplace direct for some-more opening that’s only growing,” Treadway said.

However, even a largest instance, a c3.8xlarge, that comes with 32 vCPUs and 60 MB of RAM,
is still not unequivocally allied to today’s bare-metal
capacities, that mostly run incomparable than 128 GB of RAM per earthy server. Thus, the
demand for these instances on AWS also suggests that business don’t only wish speeds and feeds —
they wish a services Amazon EC2 offers as good as improved cloud computing performance, Brooks

“[The shortage] also shows a relations value of a height and a environment,” Brooks

Amazon declined to comment.

Beth Pariseau is comparison news author for SearchCloudComputing. Write to her during or follow @PariseauTTon

Article source:

No Stores? No Salesmen? No Profit? No Problem for Amazon.

Thursday, November 7th, 2013

Why do some stores attain while others fail? Retailers constantly onslaught with this question, battling one another in ways that change with any generation. In a late 1800s, architects ruled. Successful merchants like Marshall Field sum palaces of commerce that were so beautiful shoppers rushed to come inside. In a early 1900s, mail sequence became a “killer app,” with Sears Roebuck heading a way. Toward a finish of a 20th century, ultra-efficient suburban discounters like Target and Walmart cowed all.

Now a tussles are fiercest in online retailing, where it’s tough to tell if anyone is winning. Retailers as large as Walmart and as tiny as all say their possess websites, catering to an blast of patron demand. Retail e-commerce sales stretched 15 percent in a U.S in 2012—seven times as quick as normal retail. But cost foe is relentless, and distinction margins are skinny to nonexistent. It’s easy to courtesy this $186 billion marketplace as a tainted prize: too large to ignore, too fraudulent to pursue.

Even a many successful online retailer,, has a business indication that leaves many people scratching their heads. Amazon is on lane to ring adult $75 billion in worldwide sales this year. Yet it mostly operates in a red; final quarter, Amazon posted a $41 million loss. Amazon’s owner and arch executive officer, Jeff Bezos, is indifferent to short-term earnings, carrying once quipped that when a association achieved profitability for a brief widen in 1995, “it was substantially a mistake.”

Look some-more closely during Bezos’s company, though, and a plan becomes clear. Amazon is constantly plowing income behind into a business. Its sly advanced-research division, Lab 126, works on next-generation Kindles and other mobile devices. More broadly, Amazon spends heavily to emanate a many modernized warehouses, a smoothest customer-service channels, and other facilities that assistance it squeeze an ever-larger share of a market. As former Amazon manager Eugene Wei wrote in a new blog post, “Amazon’s core business indication does beget a distinction with many any transaction … The reason it isn’t display a distinction is since it’s undertaken a large investment to support an even incomparable sales base.”

amazon chart

Much of that investment goes true into technology. To Amazon, retailing looks like a hulk engineering problem. Algorithms conclude all from a best approach to arrange a digital storefront to a optimal approach of shipping a package. Other large retailers spend heavily on promotion and sinecure a few hundred engineers to keep systems running. Amazon prefers a trifling ad bill and a payroll packaged with thousands of engineering graduates from a likes of MIT, Carnegie Mellon, and Caltech.

Other large merchants are removing a message. Walmart, a world’s largest retailer, dual years ago non-stop an RD core in Silicon Valley where it develops a possess hunt engines and looks for startups to buy. But competing on Amazon’s terms doesn’t stop with putting adult a digital storefront or formulating a mobile app. Walmart has left as distant as revelation that it might have to rethink what a stores are for. To equal Amazon’s flawless delivery, this year it even floated a thought of recruiting shoppers out of a aisles to play deliveryman, whisking products to business who’ve systematic online.

Amazon is a tech dignitary by necessity, too. The association lacks 3 of required retailing’s many simple elements: a salon where business can hold a wares; on-the-spot salespeople who can woo shoppers; and a means for business to take possession of their products a present a sale is complete. In one sense, all that Amazon’s engineers emanate is meant to make these elemental deficits disappear from sight.

Amazon’s deceit can be seen in a company’s flourishing obvious portfolio. Since 1994, and a subsidiary, Amazon Technologies, have won 1,263 patents. (By contrast, Walmart has only 53.) Each Amazon invention is meant to make offered on a site a tiny easier, a tiny some-more seductive, or to trim divided costs. Consider U.S. Patent No. 8,261,983, on “generating customized packaging” that came into being in late 2012.

“We constantly try to expostulate down a elect of atmosphere that goes into a shipment,” explains Dave Clark, a Amazon clamp boss who oversees a company’s scarcely 100 warehouses, famous as accomplishment centers. The thought of shipping products in a needlessly massive box (and essential a few additional cents to United Parcel Service or other carriers) creates him shudder. Ship scarcely a billion packages a year, and those pennies supplement up. Amazon over a years has sum some-more than 40 sizes of boxes– though even that isn’t enough. That’s a excellence of Amazon’s wrapping patent: when a customer’s peculiar pairing of equipment creates a one-of-a-kind shipment, Amazon now has systems that will discriminate a best approach to container that sequence and emanate a ideal box for it within 30 minutes.

For thousands of online merchants, it’s easier to live within Amazon’s ecosystem than to compete. So tiny retailers such as have changed their register into Amazon’s warehouses, where they compensate a elect on any sale for shipping and other services. That is apropos a rarely remunerative business for Amazon, says Goldman Sachs researcher Heath Terry. He predicts Amazon will reap $3.5 billion in income upsurge from third-party shipping in 2014, formulating a really essential side business that he values during $38 billion—about 20 percent of a company’s altogether batch marketplace value.

Jousting directly with Amazon is tougher. Researchers during Internet Retailer calculate that Amazon’s income exceeds that of a subsequent 12 competitors combined. In a regulatory filing progressing this year, Target—the third-largest tradesman in a U.S.—conceded that a “digital sales represented an vaporous volume of sum sales.” For other online entrants, a many advantageous strategies generally engage focusing on areas that a large man hasn’t cowed yet, such as offered services, online “flash sales” that trap incentive buyers who can’t pass adult a deal, or utterly severe categories such as groceries. Yet many, if not most, of these upstarts are losing money.

Confronted with today’s stream unavailing hypergrowth, Amazon’s inventors are tough during work on that problem, too. The company’s simple patents for “buy this, too” recommendations—which date behind to 2000—have been supplemented in a past dual years with scarcely a dozen additional ideas for interesting visitors to put some additional rigging into their carts. One twist: suggesting to online shoppers only a right $5.98 paperback to assistance them in. past a threshold that qualifies for giveaway shipping.

Clerks in earthy stores have been upselling for ages around classical questions such as “Would we like a tie to go with that suit?” But in Amazon’s round-the-clock digital emporium, it’s probable to aim customers’ offered carts with a diversion theorist’s precision. Weeks before a 2013 holiday offered deteriorate got rolling, for example, Amazon announced that a $25 sequence wasn’t utterly large adequate anymore to validate for giveaway shipping. The new minimum: $35.

Article source:

Amazon Web Services adds supercomputing use to the cloud

Sunday, November 3rd, 2013

Amazon Web Services (AWS) wants to attract some-more high-performance computing users to a cloud and has launched a open beta of Cluster Compute Eight Extra Large, a many absolute cloud use yet.

AWS’ cloud for high-performance computing applications offers a same advantages as it does for other other applications: it eliminates a cost and complexity of buying, configuring and handling in-house discriminate clusters, according to Amazon.

Applications that are a good fit for Amazon’s cloud-based clusters embody production simulations, seismic analysis, drug design, genome analysis, aircraft design, and a accumulation of business computing and analytics applications, it said.

Every Cluster Compute Eight Extra Large (CC2) instance has dual Intel Xeon processors, any with 8 hardware cores.

Each CC2 instance also comes with 60.5GB of RAM and 3.37TB of storage, and it communicates with other instances — or practical servers — in a cluster regulating 10 gigabit ethernet. The use is labelled during US$2.40 per hour for an on-demand instance and users can select between Linux or Windows Server 2008 R2 as their handling system.

Users can also select to buy a indifferent instance, labelled during $4,146 and $0.54 per hour when signing a one-year contract, or bid for time on a EC2 Spot Market, where costs can be a lot lower, according to Amazon.

Users who wish a complement that would validate among a Top500 many absolute supercomputers in a universe could can launch their possess array of 290 CC2 instances and compensate reduction than $1,000 per hour.

To uncover what a cloud can do, Amazon also put together a cluster that used 17,024 cores and came in 42nd place on a latest chronicle of a Top500 list of a world’s fastest supercomputers, which was expelled this week.

For now, a cluster instances are usually accessible in Amazon’s U.S. East (Northern Virginia) region, though a association skeleton to supplement that choice to other regions subsequent year.

Send news tips and comments to

Article source:

Amazon Glacier And Redshift Now In Sydney Data Centre, But You’ll Pay More

Thursday, October 10th, 2013

Please capacitate JavaScript to watch this video.

Amazon Web Services (AWS) has combined a Glacier archiving and backup use and a Redshift information warehousing use to a Sydney information centre. That’s good news if we cite your information onshore, though as with many AWS services, you’ll compensate a reward for a Sydney location.

Glacier, that , is designed for information that doesn’t need to be accessed with high frequencies though still needs to be corroborated up. You compensate formed on a volume of information stored, and additional fees for uploading or retrieval or if we change information to a opposite Amazon region.

As we can see in a pricing list below, there are radically 3 tiers of pricing: a cheapest US options, a somewhat aloft cost for EU and California, and even aloft prices for Sydney and Tokyo. One exception: transferring to another segment is indeed cheaper in Sydney than elsewhere.

The pricing differences aren’t massive, though they will supplement adult with large volumes of data. Given that Glacier is designed for sparse access, latency arguably isn’t an issue; from that perspective, using Redshift locally competence be some-more compelling.

Amazon Glacier/Amazon Redshift [AWS Blog]

Article source:

Amazon wins pivotal statute in quarrel with IBM over $600M CIA cloud computing deal

Tuesday, October 8th, 2013

amazonsignage2Amazon currently won a pivotal justice statute over IBM in a bid to secure a $600 million agreement to yield cloud-computing services to a U.S. Central Intelligence Agency.

The online calendar from the U.S. Court of Federal Claims indicates that Judge Thomas Wheeler ruled in Amazon’s preference on a objections to a Government Accountability Office’s preference to free a CIA agreement for behest after it was creatively won by Amazon Web Services.

The created content of a opinion hasn’t nonetheless been done public, though IBM has already signaled skeleton to appeal, according to Bloomberg News and the FCW sovereign record news site.

If a preference stands, it’s an vicious spin of events for Amazon in a foe to yield secure cloud computing services to supervision agencies. Earlier today, Microsoft announced its possess supervision cloud service.

In an progressing justice filing in a case, Amazon wrote, “The GAO preference contravenes timeless fashion per timeliness, standing, and prejudice, ignores several vicious defenses entirely, and infringes on a Agency’s estimable option to pattern and control procurements.”

Related Posts

Article source: