I have a series of friends who can’t know since we compensate what they impute to as ‘the Apple tax’: a reward paid for Apple products over alternatives that offer most a same functionality.
I can disagree about a functionality, of course. The usability, fortitude and (usually!) confidence of OS X are all things value profitable for in my view, yet I’m not ashamed to acknowledge that aesthetics also matter to me. When I’m going to spend 8+ hours in front of a computer, I’d rather we was looking during something neat and pleasing rather than something plastic, nauseous and a duty to use and understand.
I feel a same approach about a other record on my table and in my office, yet it isn’t always easy to find pack that works good and looks a partial too. we can’t assistance meditative there’s a lot of bureau record that could use a Jony Ive hold …
I’m not just articulate about aesthetics. Anyone who has ever set adult a standard wireless printer will expected remember a pain for some time. As Ive himself has said, pattern is not customarily about how a product looks, yet also how it works. An Apple-specced printer should bond around USB, ask me for my wifi network certification and 10 seconds after tell me it’s configured and we can mislay a cable.
A scanner, likewise, should not need a apart application to be running, we should simply bond it and be means to immediately indicate a document, with OS X seeking me what we wish to do with it, and possibly we wish to do that customarily this once or always.
It also took about 30 seconds for someone to review this post and make this suggestion:
I couldn’t determine more: unequivocally a difficulty that could use some Apple-like usability.
But in ubiquitous it’s easier to find pack that does a pursuit than tech that looks like it belongs on a same table as a Mac.
There are some third-party companies out there that do a good job. My iCube speakers (seemingly now discontinued) demeanour right during home there, as do my B+W P5 headphones. In fact, flattering most anything by B+W or BO would pass a test.
But my printer, scanner and shredder, not so much. The best that can be pronounced about those black cosmetic equipment is that they are inoffensive. Not a cut of anodised aluminum in sight.
It wouldn’t be rare for Apple to make a operation of peripherals. Apple has dabbled in speakers and Bluetooth headsets. In a early days of a Mac, Apple done printers (and indeed was mostly obliged for popularising laserprinters and giving birth to a desktop edition series behind in a late 80s). It of march still creates monitors and wifi routers today. But mostly a online and sell stores act as curators, charity a preference of third-party pack a association thinks creates a grade.
It does this pursuit improved with some product categories than others. There’s a good preference of Apple-like audio pack to select from, for example, and some of a outmost tough drives also parasite a pattern box. But printers …
I’d disagree that a best of them tumble into a ‘inoffensive’ category; nobody is going to mistake any of them for anything designed by Apple.
Apple wouldn’t need to make a tangible technology, any some-more than it does with a Macs, iPhones and iPads. Just emanate a specs, including a user-interfaces, and pattern a casings.
I commend this is pristine unhappy meditative on my part, of course. Macs are now a relatively tiny part of Apple’s business, and a numbers customarily make clarity during all since a normal sell cost is distant aloft than for iDevices. Mac peripherals would be customarily that.
iPhone accessories (beyond cases) competence make some-more clarity in terms of numbers, yet reduction clarity in terms of revenue: a immeasurable infancy of them are low-cost items.
On a other hand, accessories could be noticed like AppleCare: a comparatively easy appendage sale to move in some additional bucks. Offer a relating printer and scanner with 0 pattern alongside a Mac purchase, and I’d have suspicion adequate people would go for it to make it viable.
It competence also go some approach to obliging analysts, during slightest quickly pausing a continuous direct for new product categories. An Apple printer, scanner or orator complement is frequency a insubordinate expansion product, yet they could strike adult a normal value of a sale by a inestimable amount, and analysts caring about dollar signs, not technology.
Am we alone in my day-dreaming here, or would others also be meddlesome in removing their hands on some accessories with a Jony Ive magic? Take a poll, and let us know in a comments.
Apple rigourously appeals ebooks antitrust ruling, asks for guard to be dangling until a new preference is made
Apple releases OS X Mavericks 10.9.2 with SSL fix, FaceTime Audio, hit blocking, Mail fixes
Article source: http://9to5mac.com/2014/02/26/wishful-thinking-what-if-apple-were-to-create-a-range-of-ive-designed-office-technology/