Posts Tagged ‘Isilon’

Founder Hitz talks NetApp plan for clustering, convergence

Monday, July 2nd, 2012

Dave Hitz, NetApp Inc.’s executive clamp president, was one of a vendor’s founders in 1992 and
has had a front quarrel chair to a raft of changes in a information storage attention for 20 years. We
recently held adult with him to speak about NetApp
storage strategy
and attention trends, including clustering, converged
, storage
for virtualization
, primary
and cloud
. What is your stream purpose during NetApp?

Hitz: My purpose is arch gadfly, presumably visionary. we started as a programmer. I’ve worked
as outbound product preacher and ran engineering for a while. we took a year off and wrote a book, got concerned with
transition formulation from [CEOs] Dan
[Warmenhoven] to Tom [Georgens]
, and started essay papers called destiny histories.

We’ve finished a series of vital transitions of a company. In a mid- to late-’90s we took a big
bet on a Internet and grew adult as a company. After a pile-up hit, we re-oriented again and based
ourselves on virtualized applications. Then we placed a genuine large gamble on server virtualization.
Every 5 years we’ve re-invented ourselves as a company.

The gamble we’re holding this time is on large-scale infrastructure for data, in particular. What purpose does storage play in this large-scale infrastructure?

Hitz: The universe of information has altered a lot over a past few years. Ten years ago, it was
mostly tedious corporate things … schematics, payroll, budget. Now we’re articulate about storing baby’s
first steps, letters to a spouse, medical annals — deeply personal stuff. So a space of data
is unequivocally changing.

The other thing that’s function with information is a place where many information government used to
happen has disappeared. Data government used to mostly be on a earthy server. These days with
, a earthy server is not unequivocally many of a place. The practical machines are
flitting from one earthy server to another. And a practical servers aren’t a good place for data
management given typically we have mixed practical servers pity information joining into the
same database. So a doubt is ‘Where does a information government go?’ And increasingly, it’s been
moving into a storage layer. The outcome of that is storage is starting to spin an
infrastructure for data. What we meant by infrastructure is that it’s a apparatus that’s shared,
used by lot of opposite people nonetheless managed centrally. How is this reflected in NetApp’s
strategy for a storage

Hitz: A large partial of that is a clustering we’ve expelled in Ontap 8. We consider clustering
is unequivocally foundational to be means to have these characteristics where we can take out a server and
install a opposite server. How do we make that occur when there’s information on that storage server
that needs to be there? The answer is we need to have these things clustered together with the
ability to only transparently quit information from one place to another. NetApp has worked on clustering for utterly a while, unequivocally given acquiring
Spinnaker Networks in 2004. Data Ontap 8 was ostensible to be a chronicle with full clustering, but
you didn’t speak about that many when 8.0 came out. And we still charity Ontap in Version 7 mode,
without clustering. Why have we waited until
to unequivocally stress clustering?

Hitz: When we shipped 8.0, it was a flattering radical ascent of Ontap, kind of
corresponding to when Microsoft came out with Windows NT. we mean, large architectural changes. We
took a opposite proceed — when Windows NT came out there was a classical mode, nonetheless that wasn’t the
default. When we came out in 8.0, it ran by default in 7 mode. That means we did this radical
architectural ascent with all a foundations for clustering in place nonetheless didn’t boat it with all
that things incited on. And we didn’t make all that large of a understanding of it during a time given we wanted
to get all a pieces prepared so that people would be means to flip it on.

So 8.1 is indeed a place where we’re revelation a story of clustering, when we’ve got proof
cases commissioned now and business regulating it. So we took some-more of a ‘Let’s get a infrastructure in
place, get people regulating on it and afterwards make a lot of sound [approach].’ So here we are in 8.1 and
we’re revelation a story of 8.0. Maybe we’re too regressive [in our] marketing, nonetheless we like to
know what we have before we blow a bugles. How many NetApp
business are regulating clustering?

Hitz: It’s a comparatively tiny percentage, singular digits. Our idea was initial to get 8.0
deployed with a whole new architecture, and make certain that whole new architectural horizon was
stable. While we were operative on building clustering into Ontap, EMC
bought Isilon
and had a mature clustering shipping product. How does NetApp’s clustering
stack adult vs. Isilon?

Hitz: You have a unequivocally tough choice if we go with Isilon. Because on a one hand, EMC
has a lot of engaging capabilities: snapshots, cloning, dedupe, compression, a abounding set of data
management features. The problem with EMC is that for any of those facilities we have to contend ‘Wait
a minute, that product has it?’ And it’s not uniform opposite them. You contend ‘I wish to use SATA
drives.’ Well, we can do that for Isilon; if we wish to do this other thing, it’s VMAX
and [for] this other thing it’s VNX.

If we demeanour during facilities EMC can support, we finish adult with a finish list. If we mangle apart
their architectures and demeanour during a same underline list by architecture, we finish adult anticipating a main
feature Isilon has is clustering, that is great. Unfortunately, it’s not in multiple with the
full apartment of abounding information government capabilities. That’s a No. 1 disproportion Ontap has — it’s the
same Ontap that has all this cold things in it.

Second, what people find with Isilon is that we can scale it, nonetheless when it comes time for a
hardware refresh, you’re articulate downtime. You don’t take down your network when we put a new
router in place. You shouldn’t have to take down your new information infrastructure when we put new
storage systems in place. A lot of IT vendors are relocating toward a converged infrastructure combining
storage, networking and discriminate into one offering. NetApp does this by a
architecture. Will joining be a widespread trend in storage implementation?

Hitz: There are dual competing trends. we have this design in my conduct of a smoke-stack of
stuff we need to put together a information center. There’s a CPU chip itself, a handling system,
applications like databases, capabilities like networking and storage. You can consider of that as a
vertical stack. On one palm there’s vigour to get that whole straight smoke-stack integrated to make it
easier for customers.

There’s another trend, horizontalization, with companies meditative of their possess sold layer.
When we consider of that trend, we consider of companies like Intel with a chip or Microsoft with the
operating complement or Cisco with networking. The doubt is that of these trends is winning? It
looks to me, in terms of IP tenure and a tangible record development, a plane model
is winning. Oracle’s database beats any of a aged server guys’ database; Cisco’s networking beats
any of a aged server guys’ networking; and EMC, Hitachi Data Systems [HDS] and NetApp are
two-thirds of a storage market. You discuss EMC, NetApp and HDS winning a storage market, nonetheless there’s
still a far-reaching opening between we and marketplace personality EMC. How can we tighten that gap?

Hitz: Ontap is a No.1 storage design in a market. EMC is still a good bit
larger than us in storage marketplace share, nonetheless EMC is deploying lots of opposite architectures.
They’ve got Enginuity for Symmetrix and apart architectures for Clariion/Celerra, Data Domain
and Isilon. If we demeanour during marketplace share by architecture, NetApp is No. 1, EMC is No. 2, 3 and 4,
and afterwards NetApp is No. 5 with a E-Series.

Even nonetheless EMC is offered some-more storage, it’s not a best building retard for infrastructure
because we always have to stop and say, ‘Wait a minute, did we wish it to be Celerra style, VNX
style, VNXe style, VMAX character or Isilon style?’ All of those are opposite things.

We have a E-Series for impassioned cases. We contend a E is for Extreme — super-high bandwidth,
Teradata-style storage. But in general, we tell them, ‘Ontap’s a answer.’ It’s a simple
answer. NetApp boasts of a potency with VMware. Now we have vendors building
machine storage systems
from a belligerent up. Are they a hazard to NetApp?

Hitz: Around 2007, we done a large gamble on VMware. We restructured a association around it.
We’ve been doing VMware for a prolonged time now. We’ve partnered effectively with VMware, some-more so than
EMC’s possess storage people. we don’t know what new guys are doing that’s designed from a belligerent up,
but we have years of sappy in that space. NetApp was a initial to offer deduplication for primary data. Are many of
your business regulating it yet?

Hitz: We took a demeanour during a adoption rate of dedupe around a world. The worldwide
average invasion of dedupe is about 25%, nonetheless by geographies, some are enormously higher. In
Denmark, around 65% of all NetApp ability commissioned was deduped. Nebraska was 2%. we started
thinking, ‘What’s wrong with Nebraska or special about Denmark?’ What happens is these technologies
go viral in an area, and afterwards they spread. we nonetheless 25% worldwide, maybe that’s best we can do.
But if a 65% in Denmark, because not other places? It incited out, a channel partners in a Nordic
region only got a sacrament on dedupe and done it standard. They pronounced ‘We spin it on by default;
if business insist they don’t wish it we spin it off.’ But customarily they don’t ask to spin it

If we unequivocally wish business to take advantage, a idea needs to be to make them buy it on
default. That’s where we’re headed for dedupe and compression. Software has to be intelligent adequate to
look during a use box and have some-more or reduction assertive dedupe and a complement can auto-tune. What is a NetApp
toward cloud storage?

Hitz: People use a tenure ‘cloud’ in lots of ways, infrequently people use cloud as they
have a garland of VMware. A lot of people meant a large-scale common infrastructure information center. The
other definition of cloud is as a business model. Do we wish to build a new information core myself or let
somebody else build a information core and I’ll lease it from them? The doubt is, ‘Who’s going to
build a information center: a patron or a cloud provider?’ We concentration a lot on cloud providers as a
business model.

When we demeanour during people regulating 50 petabytes-plus, many are doing some character of cloud computing
either as an infrastructure play or a some-more targeted approach of building out an inner service.

Article source:

FlexPod certified by Microsoft for private cloud: News roundup

Friday, April 27th, 2012

FlexPod gains Microsoft validation for private cloud
IT pros that devise to build a private cloud now have a information centre infrastructure height certified by Microsoft.

FlexPod common infrastructure has turn a initial information centre use to be certified for a updated Microsoft Private Cloud Fast Track 2.0.

Through a Fast Track 2.0 program, Cisco, NetApp and Microsoft have collaborated to assistance users revoke infrastructure and focus deployment time and grasp larger utilization of their earthy and practical resources.

In addition, a vendors also collaborated for desktop virtualisation. They have expelled a new certified pattern design regulating Microsoft private cloud with Citrix XenDesktop program on a FlexPod system.

As a result, administrators can broach desktops, applications, and information as a private cloud use with XenDesktop. They can also support existent and new applications, quit to new handling systems, and broach corporate resources to new devices.  

This government formation with FlexPod helps IT pros  deploy and conduct private cloud infrastructure some-more easily, ensuing in revoke operational costs and aloft ROI, pronounced Satinder Sethi, clamp boss of information centre organisation during Cisco.

Intelligent Energy’s storage and server upgrades yields results
Intelligent Energy Ltd, a UK-headquartered energy systems company, has upgraded a server and storage infrastructure to grasp larger coherence and performance, conduct business expansion and revoke costs.

The firm’s IT instituted a plan after saying a 300% expansion in information in one year. It virtualised and combined a infrastructure regulating Dell’s PowerEdge R710 servers. This helped it enhance a capabilities and opening of a server network. 

The new infrastructure’s energy expenditure and hardware costs were also 80% revoke than a bequest facility.

To optimise opening and promote administration in a information centre, a IT group combined a pool of resources that can be scaled to support expansion as good as to promote real-time interactive product designs.

In further to practical servers, they deployed Dell’s Compellent storage arrays, permitting for virtualisation during a storage covering of a information centre infrastructure. The programmed tiering capabilities have helped a IT track non-critical information to storage thereby assisting supplement some-more capacity.

The new server and storage infrastructure also done information backup easy by giving IT pros ability to snapshot practical machines.

Onyx Group Selects EMC Isilon for a VMware formed platform
Onyx Group, a UK record provider specialising in information centres, network services and cloud has comparison EMC Isilon scale-out NAS product as partial of OnyxCloud, one of UK’s cloud IaaS offerings.

The firm’s IT group found that OynxCloud IaaS system’s underlying storage design was not matched to a long-term ability and opening requirements. The group opted for EMC Isilon since of a formation with VMware platforms that Onyx Group uses.

The group had assistance from 4 eccentric experts to weigh 10 products. Customers will see advantages such as improved formation and scalability since of Isilon’s facilities such as SyncIQ riposte program and OneFS handling system, according to a firm.

Article source:

Silver Peak helps EMC Isilon business replicate Big Data 90X faster over a WAN

Thursday, April 12th, 2012

Carnival Australia PO Cruise ships get diverge speed WAN with Silver Peak
announced 7 months

Silver Peak and Avaya confederate WAN optimisation on bend routers to optimise voice, video and information to remote offices
announced 9 months

Silver Peak backs open WAN optimisation record to solve bandwidth problems
announced 7 months

Article source:

Scale-out pure Fujitsu pushes out high-performing tool

Friday, November 4th, 2011

SNW Europe The scale-out record computing universe has a new player: Fujitsu. The association has only pushed out a FEFS product in Japan.

Fujitsu FEFS is a terabyte per second scale-out record complement for high-performance computing. It could come westwards and yield foe for SONAS, EMC Isilon, and other vast information record systems.

FEFS stands for Fujitsu Exabyte File System and it has been grown from Lustre. The thing beam to 8EB, 8 thousand petabytes, and supports from a few dozen servers adult to one million. Fujitsu says it enables high-speed together distributed estimate of really vast amounts of read/write exchange from a discriminate nodes in an X86 HPC cluster.

FEFS can be configured with 10,000 storage systems delivering what Fujitsu claims is a world’s top throughput of 1 TB/sec. The file-system can emanate several tens of thousands of files per second. Its metadata government is adult to 3 times faster than simple Lustre, according to Fujitsu.

Fujitsu’s Marcus Schneider, executive of storage product marketing, said: “FEFS is a scale out mechanism using a Lustre-based filesystem. We finished it dramatically some-more scalable, and hardened a product really much. It is a pristine HPC play, an superb encouragement to Lustre. In Europe we acquired a German association specialising in high-performance computing: HPC Aachen. we was really tender by a work they have done.”

That suggests that we’ll be saying FEFS in Europe. If we wish a FEFS complement in Japan, Fujitsu will supply it with Primergy X86 servers and Eternus storage arrays. The smallest pattern is 4 Primergy RX300 S6 servers with InfiniBand connections, 3 Eternus DX80 S2 storage units, and a FEFS licence. The cost starts from ¥21,430,000 ($274,570.17.) ®

Article source:

Scale-out storage options boost capacity, I/O performance

Tuesday, June 28th, 2011

is rising in recognition in a storage industry. Early adopters of a record were
primarily companies that had vast ability requirements, though now tiny firms and vast enterprises
are implementing a record in their information storage environments. The record allows
organizations to start out with a tiny volume of information storage and enhance it to fit their needs
without dishing out a lot of upfront costs. In addition, specific forms of scale-out storage, such
as scale-out network-attached storage (NAS), can assistance boost opening and sustainability.

This educational discusses how and because scale-out storage and scale-out NAS are gaining traction in
today’s storage environments. Take a demeanour during because cloud
, scale-out NAS and intent storage are replacing record storage. Read a box investigate on
photo/video association Industrial Color Inc. and because Isilon scale-out NAS was a improved fit for its
demanding workloads than normal NAS. Finally, listen

to a podcast on scale-out NAS in which
Enterprise Strategy Group comparison researcher Terri McClure predicts that in a subsequent 5 years scale-out storage will
make adult a infancy of information storage systems.

NAS, intent storage, cloud gateways replacing record storage

As some-more people turn discontented with their file-based primary storage, 3 technologies are
becoming some-more distinguished in a storage industry: scale-out
, object-based storage and regulating a cloud as a NAS tier. See out how these 3 NAS
technologies can assistance with your primary record storage and confirm that one is right for your storage

scale-out NAS helps prolongation association conduct 250 TB

Industrial Color Inc., a New York-based artistic prolongation company, commissioned Isilon scale-out
NAS 5 years ago to hoop a vast quantities of photos and videos. According to Aaron Holm,
the company’s clamp boss of development, a association wouldn’t be means to run a approach it does
without a use of Isilon scale-out network-attached storage. Find out because a normal NAS system
wasn’t adequate for Industrial Color and how Isilon
scale-out NAS
helps a association accommodate a perfectionist storage needs of a media and entertainment

changing face of scale-out network-attached storage

More and some-more craving IT shops are implementing scale-out network-attached storage systems
for their storage environments. Scale-out NAS systems have a ability to supplement storage nodes or x86
servers, that can assistance boost ability and performance, as good as improved support file
I/O-intensive applications. In this podcast interview, Terri McClure discusses a latest changes
in NAS, recommendation for shops looking to switch to scale-out NAS and a opposite hurdles that pop
up with regulating scale-out NAS. Listen to a full podcast on scale-out
network-attached storage

This was initial published in Jun 2011

Article source:

Isilon scale-out NAS helps prolongation association conduct 250 TB

Friday, June 17th, 2011

Industrial Color Inc. commissioned a initial of 5 Isilon Systems Inc. scale-out network-attached storage (NAS) clusters five
years ago to cope with a torrent of digital photos uploaded by a homegrown GLOBALedit Web

Aaron Holm, a company’s clamp boss of development, pronounced he can’t suppose regulating anything
other than scale-out NAS to hoop a digital photos and videos of business such as
Kohl’s, NBC Universal, Old Navy, Victoria’s Secret and Warner Brothers.

Read a whole educational on scale-out storage

The changing face of scale-out
network-attached storage

, intent storage, cloud gateways replacing record storage

→ Isilon scale-out NAS helps prolongation association conduct 250 TB

New York-based Industrial Color had approximately 25 TB of information in 2006 when it purchased its
first clustered NAS complement from Isilon, prolonged before EMC Corp. acquired a businessman in
late 2010. The association now stores about 250 TB of information opposite a 5 Isilon scale-out NAS clusters.

“I don’t consider we’d be means to do what we do as a business unless we had that kind of storage,”
Holm said. “It’s fundamental.”

Industrial Color has dual businesses: program and artistic photo/video production. The company
builds and hosts dual Web-based software-as-a-service (SaaS) applications: GLOBALedit for work-in-progress
photo and video management, examination and approval; and File Society for high-speed record transfer. The
IT group also manages information storage of digital photos and videos that a company’s technicians shoot
for a Capture and Motion businesses.

Although Holm didn’t privately find out “clustered” NAS or “scale-out” NAS before to a initial Isilon purchase, he was
looking for a complement that would let a association scale as simply and low as probable to
meet sharpening information storage needs.

“We only wanted unequivocally high accessibility and high-performance storage,” he said.

Before switching to Isilon scale-out NAS, GLOBALedit used a normal NAS system from NetApp Inc. When a NetApp NAS complement reached a limit, the
IT group faced a awaiting of shopping new NAS heads and hoop trays or maybe an whole new

Holm pronounced with Isilon’s OneFS handling complement regulating opposite all a hardware, adding storage
nodes is as easy as plugging in a new Isilon blade and typing a authority to supplement it to the

“With Isilon, we supplement a storage, though we also supplement a additional network interfaces, cache and
processing since of a new hardware you’ve combined to a infrastructure,” Holm said. “Because
every node in an Isilon cluster has a same components, when we scale it, you’re indeed adding
performance [in further to capacity].”

The judgment of failover in scale-out vs. normal NAS also appeals to Holm. “With NetApp,
the failover is formed on a thought that we have dual of everything,” he said. “With Isilon, the
failover is formed on a handling complement being striped opposite a whole cluster.”

But since Isilon wasn’t designed to hoop mainstream business applications, Industrial Color
kept a NetApp complement with approximately 5 TB for database servers.

Industrial Color’s second Isilon cluster coincided with a pierce from Manhattan to White Plains,
N.Y., to a new disaster liberation (DR) facility. The plan spanned 4 months since the
team motionless to change a prolongation information from GLOBALedit’s bequest Isilon iSeries 6000 to a new
X-Series 9000. Holm pronounced a iSeries complement is used for DR now.

Holm pronounced he’s tender by Isilon’s ceaselessly elaborating roadmap, that tends to keep gait with
his needs. For example, Industrial Color recently indispensable to hurl out a 10 Gigabit Ethernet (10 GbE) network to tide high-definition video
simultaneously to 4 desktops. Isilon’s latest S-Series supports 10 GbE.

“A year ago, Isilon didn’t have a product that would have met what we wanted to do,” he

Industrial Color had been regulating Apple Inc.’s Xsan storage with a Capture and Motion businesses when it
recognized a need for a complement that could scale faster and need reduction time to manage.

“At that point, a metadata doing on a Xsan had harm us. We’d had situations where
we’d had sum storage failure,” Holm said.

But a three-month pierce from a Xsan to a some-more worldly Isilon cluster was not without
pain; a new complement compulsory some-more executive imagination as good as engineering work on the
network to get it to perform as desired. But, Holm said, a bid was value it.

“We need to be means to focus on a dime,” he said, observant that a patron competence need 10 TB of
storage in reduction than a day.

The GLOBALedit focus now runs opposite 30 servers and uses Isilon’s X-Series 9000, or 9000x,
with 9 storage nodes for approximately 70 TB of primary information and about 60 TB for disaster
recovery. File Society’s 9000x, purchased in 2009, has 4 nodes and approximately 24 TB. Capture
uses 9000x (bought in 2008) and has tighten to 36 TB opposite 4 nodes. And Motion uses a faster
S-Series and has 48 TB opposite 7 nodes.

The IT group can supplement storage nodes while a complement is running. To recompense for any performance
hit when adding a server to a cluster, a group times a changes to coincide with durations of low

“The reason since we’ve favourite Isilon is since eventually their doing is only simpler,”
Holm said. “It’s a easier approach to yield both administration and provisioning for really large,
scalable storage clusters.”

This was initial published in Jun 2011

Article source:

Clustered NAS systems: Network-attached storage on steroids

Friday, April 15th, 2011

Traditionally, network-attached storage (NAS) was a safety of a bureau or dialect where
a dissimilar device gave file-level entrance to comparatively tiny files and didn’t need to pull capacity
or opening envelopes. But new years have seen a arise of clustered
, that allows a joining together of mixed inclination in a common record complement that can
range in ability to petabytes. With a choice to boost ability or opening and an palliate of
management brought about by a singular perspective of a outrageous record system, clustered NAS is suitable as a
supremely scalable deputy for normal NAS systems
or as a ideal resolution to offer large singular files.

In this Special Report, you’ll find out about how clustered NAS outlines a step
change from normal NAS, a pivotal clustered NAS vendors, because NetApp’s clustered NAS is different
from everybody else’s, how to select a right clustered NAS product and how dual IT organisations
implemented clustered NAS from BlueArc and EMC Isilon, respectively.

Clustered NAS vs normal NAS solutions

In this essay storage manager and blogger Martin Glassborow looks during what creates clustered NAS
stand out from normal NAS solutions and surveys some of a pivotal clustered NAS vendors.

Podcast: NetApp cluster functionality vs competitors’ clustered file

In this podcast, Martin Glassborow outlines what defines clustered NAS and looks into how
NetApp’s focus of a record works and because a NetApp cluster doing is opposite from a clustered record systems
used by a competitors.

Clustered NAS: How to select a right clustered NAS system

Clustered NAS products are not all combined equal. Before we buy we need to know your
requirements in terms of record complement distance limits, either a record complement spans all nodes and how
the several vendors’ technologies differ, or indeed if a clustered NAS system is right for we during all.

Clustered NAS from BlueArc supplants Isilon during film effects firm

A box investigate of how a UK film effects business implemented clustered NAS from BlueArc to store 200 TB of film files with demanding
random entrance opening requirements.

Clustered NAS picked to store petabytes of digital moon images

Read adult on how an Arizona university investigate group deployed some-more than a petabyte of clustered NAS storage from EMC Isilon to understanding with hundreds of gigabytes of
images and information sent behind to Earth daily from NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO).

13 Apr 2011

Article source:

Clustered NAS vs normal NAS solutions

Friday, April 15th, 2011

has a roots in a worlds of media and high-performance computing; these dual areas have
dealt with a problems of handling massively scalable storage solutions for longer than most.

Traditional NAS
still hark behind to a commencement days of Auspex Systems and NetApp, where a NAS
solution during a unequivocally simple turn was a server with some hoop trustworthy to it. You could supplement more
disk and a some-more absolute server, though scalability was singular in terms of opening and

Traditional NAS solutions radically enclose a singular storage device; some-more than one of them
may be configured in failover cluster, though scalability is singular by a volume of CPU/memory and
disk that a singular NAS device can make use of. In a box of failover environments, best practise
places an top extent of 50% of any server’s particular ability to yield a space compulsory for

By contrast, clustered NAS allows plane scaling opposite a series of inclination with all of them
being active and means to see all files in a cluster. This has a series of advantages:

  • If your storage servers turn CPU/memory-bound, we can supplement a device to benefit estimate power
    without adding disk.
  • If we run out of storage, we can supplement hoop that all inclination can see, though we don’t have to
    purchase additional devices.
  • A device disaster is non-disruptive, and a bucket of a unsuccessful section can be widespread opposite the
    whole cluster.

Scalability benefits

The special salsa in a heading clustered NAS products is a distributed record system. This
enables all a nodes in a cluster to see all a files in a environment; examples are OneFS
from EMC-Isilon,
Parallel File System
(GPFS) from IBM and Ibrix
from Hewlett-Packard.

This ability to scale opening and ability mandate exclusively of any other is an
important underline of many clustered NAS solutions. This allows some-more effective use of resources
compared with normal NAS, as it is no longer compulsory to squeeze new NAS inclination to add
capacity or to squeeze storage when all that is compulsory is some-more throughput during a storage server

Clustered NAS can lift out all normal NAS record portion mandate in a some-more scalable
manner. For example, SONAS
from IBM starts during 27 TB and could be configured with usually a integrate of nodes. This would compare
very pretty to a normal NAS solution.

But NAS clustering unequivocally comes into a possess when we have a fast flourishing NAS estate scaling
to many terabytes of storage with a fast expansion bend and a requirement to grow non-disruptively
and with minimal emigration effort.

In a past if expansion compulsory some-more NAS, we mostly indispensable to quit existent information to a new,
larger-capacity device. With clustered NAS a further of additional ability and opening does not
require a information emigration practice given all storage servers can see all a data.

There’s distant reduction bid concerned in handling clustered NAS compared with mixed traditional
NAS devices, and we have found in discussions with colleagues in a attention that with clustered
NAS we can conduct in additional of 1 petabyte (PB) per full-time homogeneous (FTE) employee.

Clustered NAS is commencement to make a vast impact in vast virtualised environments where many
thousands of server images along with their information can be stored in a multi-node NAS cluster. EMC’s
acquisition of Isilon will positively expostulate a use of NAS clustering in VMware environments.

Clustered NAS

With EMC’s merger of Isilon during a finish of 2010, HP’s merger of Ibrix in 2009 and
NetApp’s merger of Spinnaker in 2003, there are now a series of mature vendors in this space.
And Symantec has even waded into a market. Here’s a relapse of these vendors’ products.

EMC. The core of Isilon’s product is a OneFS Operating System, that beam performance
in a near-linear conform as some-more nodes are added, adult to a limit of 144, and can yield a
capacity of some-more than 10 PB in a singular record system.

An Isilon cluster can be done adult of a series of nodes that yield for IOPS, sequential
throughput or capacity, that allows for a good understanding of coherence in configuration.

Isilon offers programmed storage tiering regulating an programmed process engine famous as SmartPools.
SmartPools also allows additional nodes to be total and information to be restriped opposite these nodes

IBM. IBM has built a possess clustered NAS resolution formed on a mature GPFS clustered file
system and customary Lintel servers; these have been total to furnish SONAS (Scale Out Network
Attached Storage).

SONAS supports billions of files and some-more than 14 PB of storage in a singular record complement with up
to 30 interface nodes and 30 storage pods means to be configured in a singular SONAS cluster.

Different forms of hoop can be put into opposite pools with a process engine used to determine
file chain and record migration. The process engine can restripe information when new nodes are added.
Tape can also be entirely integrated as an additional pool with Tivoli
Storage Manager
, providing pure hierarchical
storage management
(HSM) capabilities.

HP. HP has bundled a Ibrix program it acquired with HP server record to build the
X9000 Network Storage System. This comes in a series of models, including gateways that allow
customers to yield their possess hoop though also entirely integrated appliances that enclose servers and
storage. All models in a X9000 operation can be total into a singular record complement to yield adult to
16 PB of record space. The X9000 supports information tiering that can pierce information seamlessly and without
disruption onto suitable tiers of storage.

NetApp. The formula of NetApp’s Spinnaker merger were realised in a form of a OnTap 8
operating system. OnTap 8 provides a normal NAS sourroundings though also can be configured in
cluster mode to yield a scale-out environment. This preference contingency be done during a implement of your
NetApp appliance, and now there is no approach of migrating between these dual modes. OnTap 8
cluster mode allows adult to 24 (or 12 pairs) of NetApp filers to be total into a singular cluster.
OnTap 8 has substantially a slightest in common architecturally with any of a competitors. Cluster mode
only unequivocally allows any of a filers to offer one another’s record systems around a singular service
name; there is no singular tellurian record system.

So nonetheless a tellurian namespace could cover a full ability of all of a filers total –
which is now in additional of 40 PB — a particular record systems are singular to 100 TB. This is
a critical reduction in a NetApp doing of clustered NAS as it lacks a magnificence of one
large record complement and will need some-more work, including an increasing information emigration workload, to
scale environments.

Symantec. Symantec has recently launched clustered NAS in a form of a Filestore
in a partnership with Huawei. Although Symantec’s N8300 charity usually beam to 1.4 PB,
Huawei has a high-end charity in a form of OceanSpace N8500, that beam to some-more than 15 PB of
storage. Depending on Symantec’s success with a N8300, we might see a Symantec-badged N8500 in

13 Apr 2011

Article source: