Posts Tagged ‘service level agreements’

ComplianceOnline Announces Seminar on GRC for Safe and Effective Cloud …

Sunday, June 1st, 2014

ComplianceOnline, a heading governance, risk and correspondence advisory network with over 500 experts in several regulatory subjects, currently announced a convention on Governance, Risk Management and Compliance (GRC) for Safe and Effective Cloud Computing – Cloud Service Level Agreements (SLAs). The dual day convention led by Enterprise and IT GRC consultant Javier Kuong will be hold on Jun 26 and 27, 2014 in Amsterdam.

Amsterdam, The Netherlands (PRWEB) May 31, 2014

This convention will cover beliefs and discipline of GRC as they request to cloud computing. It will residence several classes of use turn agreements for a cloud.

For some-more information or to register for a seminar, greatfully click here.

Seminar instructor Javier F. Kuong is a President and Principal Consultant of Management Advisory Services Publications (MASP), an classification that for over 30 years has been clinging only to consulting, training, publications, investigate and growth in Enterprise and IT Governance, Compliance, Auditing, Security, Service Level Agreements and Business Continuity Planning. He is a author of over 40 books and treatises in a above fields of expertise. He is a author of a really new book entitled: “Service Level Agreements for Cloud Computing – Guidelines for Selecting Cloud Service Providers.”

During a dual day interactive seminar, Mr. Kuong will plead Governance, Risk Management and Compliance (GRC) issues for a cloud. He will cover elemental beliefs and discipline of GRC as they request to cloud computing. Attendees will learn approaches and a pivotal elements concerned in scheming a sound set of Service Level Agreements (SLAs) for cloud computing. This convention will also yield unsentimental discipline for a protected preference of cloud use providers to safeguard adequate GRC supplies are satisfied.

The march will support executives and professionals in practicing obliged due industry for cloud computing. IT executives, CIOs, systems and datacenter professionals, Chief Security Officers (CSOs), Chief Technology Officers (CTOs), confidence and control professionals, corporate and IT governance officers, inner and outmost auditors, record assessors, government consultants and cloud use providers will advantage from this seminar.

Date: Thursday, Jun 26 (8.30 AM- 4.30 PM) and Friday, Jun 27, 2014 (8.30 AM- 4.30 PM)

Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Registration Cost: $1699.00 per registration

Early bird discounts: For discounts on early registrations, greatfully click here..

Register by phone: Please call a patron use specialists during +1-650-620-3937 or email to customercare(at)complianceonline(dot)com

For some-more information on ComplianceOnline or to crop by a trainings, greatfully revisit our website.

About ComplianceOnline

ComplianceOnline is a heading provider of regulatory correspondence trainings for companies and professionals in regulated industries. ComplianceOnline has successfully lerned over 35,000 professionals from 9,000 companies to approve with a mandate of regulatory agencies. ComplianceOnline is headquartered in Palo Alto, California and can be reached during http://www.complianceonline.com. ComplianceOnline is a MetricStream portal. MetricStream (http://www.metricstream.com) is a marketplace personality in Enterprise-wide Governance, Risk, Compliance (GRC) and Quality Management Solutions for tellurian corporations.

For some-more information greatfully contact:

A Reuben Bernard

Manager of Program Marketing

ComplianceOnline

2600 E Bayshore Rd

Palo Alto CA USA 94303

650-620-3937 phone

650-963-2530 fax

reuben(at)complianceonline(dot)com

http://www.complianceonline.com

For a strange chronicle on PRWeb visit: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2014/06/prweb11899737.htm

Article source: http://www.busbyway.com/2014/05/31/complianceonline-announces-seminar-on-grc-for-safe-and-effective-cloud-computing/

EGI Cloud: SLAs and Summer School

Thursday, August 29th, 2013

As cloud computing has evolved, so have users’ expectations. Increasingly, users are perfectionist clearly specified, legally contracting use turn agreements (SLA) from their cloud providers. The EGI is providing superintendence on this critical aspect of cloud computing in a new European Commission report, called Cloud Computing Service Level Agreements.

“The fast expansion of a cloud marketplace is heading to a presentation of new services, new ways for use provisioning and new communication and partnership models both among cloud providers and use ecosystems exploiting cloud resources,” write a report’s authors.

“Service Level Agreements (SLAs) oversee a aforementioned relations by defining a terms of rendezvous for a participating entities,” they continue. “Besides sourroundings a expectations by dictating a peculiarity and a form of service, SLAs are also increasingly deliberate by a providers as a pivotal differentiator to grasp rival advantage.”

The news introduces recommendations for a finish SLA lifecycle and papers a persisting process work on SLAs achieved by a Cloud Select Industry Group (SIG). For a 11 pivotal recommendations, a extensive 61-page request sets out a trail to implementation, including a goal, due stairs and intensity contributors.

“There are many kinds of clouds out there and there is not usually one special ‘Cloud SLA.’” explains Michel Drescher, EGI.eu’s Technical Manager. “For instance during EGI we are providing an Infrastructure as a Service cloud platform. This is really opposite to what others are doing so we’re formulating template SLAs to make it easier for tiny communities to get adult and running.”

In other EGI cloud news, EGI.eu and a University of Messina supposing training for users of a EGI Federated Cloud during a Cloud Summer School Almere, from Jul 22-26, 2013. The march supposing students with hands-on knowledge on tangible resources located in a Czech Republic (CESnet) and in Spain (CESGA).

In a past, instruction had been formed on a simplified internal exam cloud, though this was a initial time that a secure prolongation cloud was employed in training exercises. Students ran their applications in a genuine secure federated cloud environment. EGI.eu skeleton to use this indication as a template for serve training sessions.

Leading a bid were Michel Drescher with EGI and Massimo Villari, highbrow during a University of Messina. Local support was supposing by a Windesheim University and Genias Benelux.

“For us this is a step towards Cloud 2.0. where all is most easier to set up,” reported Massimo Villari.

“For EGI.eu this was a really good experience, removing out of a comfort section and not usually yield services to scientists, though also to tutors. we also schooled a lot from operative with a students that brought in some uninformed ideas,” pronounced Michel Drescher.

An interview with these plan leads is accessible on YouTube.

Article source: http://www.hpcwire.com/hpcwire/2013-08-28/egi_cloud:_slas_and_summer_school.html

EGI Cloud: SLAs and Summer School

Thursday, August 29th, 2013

As cloud computing has evolved, so have users’ expectations. Increasingly, users are perfectionist clearly specified, legally contracting use turn agreements (SLA) from their cloud providers. The EGI is providing superintendence on this critical aspect of cloud computing in a new European Commission report, called Cloud Computing Service Level Agreements.

“The fast expansion of a cloud marketplace is heading to a presentation of new services, new ways for use provisioning and new communication and partnership models both among cloud providers and use ecosystems exploiting cloud resources,” write a report’s authors.

“Service Level Agreements (SLAs) oversee a aforementioned relations by defining a terms of rendezvous for a participating entities,” they continue. “Besides sourroundings a expectations by dictating a peculiarity and a form of service, SLAs are also increasingly deliberate by a providers as a pivotal differentiator to grasp rival advantage.”

The news introduces recommendations for a finish SLA lifecycle and papers a persisting process work on SLAs achieved by a Cloud Select Industry Group (SIG). For a 11 pivotal recommendations, a extensive 61-page request sets out a trail to implementation, including a goal, due stairs and intensity contributors.

“There are many kinds of clouds out there and there is not usually one special ‘Cloud SLA.’” explains Michel Drescher, EGI.eu’s Technical Manager. “For instance during EGI we are providing an Infrastructure as a Service cloud platform. This is really opposite to what others are doing so we’re formulating template SLAs to make it easier for tiny communities to get adult and running.”

In other EGI cloud news, EGI.eu and a University of Messina supposing training for users of a EGI Federated Cloud during a Cloud Summer School Almere, from Jul 22-26, 2013. The march supposing students with hands-on knowledge on tangible resources located in a Czech Republic (CESnet) and in Spain (CESGA).

In a past, instruction had been formed on a simplified internal exam cloud, though this was a initial time that a secure prolongation cloud was employed in training exercises. Students ran their applications in a genuine secure federated cloud environment. EGI.eu skeleton to use this indication as a template for serve training sessions.

Leading a bid were Michel Drescher with EGI and Massimo Villari, highbrow during a University of Messina. Local support was supposing by a Windesheim University and Genias Benelux.

“For us this is a step towards Cloud 2.0. where all is most easier to set up,” reported Massimo Villari.

“For EGI.eu this was a really good experience, removing out of a comfort section and not usually yield services to scientists, though also to tutors. we also schooled a lot from operative with a students that brought in some uninformed ideas,” pronounced Michel Drescher.

An interview with these plan leads is accessible on YouTube.

Article source: http://www.hpcwire.com/hpcwire/2013-08-28/egi_cloud:_slas_and_summer_school.html

EGI Cloud: SLAs and Summer School

Thursday, August 29th, 2013

As cloud computing has evolved, so have users’ expectations. Increasingly, users are perfectionist clearly specified, legally contracting use turn agreements (SLA) from their cloud providers. The EGI is providing superintendence on this critical aspect of cloud computing in a new European Commission report, called Cloud Computing Service Level Agreements.

“The fast expansion of a cloud marketplace is heading to a presentation of new services, new ways for use provisioning and new communication and partnership models both among cloud providers and use ecosystems exploiting cloud resources,” write a report’s authors.

“Service Level Agreements (SLAs) oversee a aforementioned relations by defining a terms of rendezvous for a participating entities,” they continue. “Besides sourroundings a expectations by dictating a peculiarity and a form of service, SLAs are also increasingly deliberate by a providers as a pivotal differentiator to grasp rival advantage.”

The news introduces recommendations for a finish SLA lifecycle and papers a persisting process work on SLAs achieved by a Cloud Select Industry Group (SIG). For a 11 pivotal recommendations, a extensive 61-page request sets out a trail to implementation, including a goal, due stairs and intensity contributors.

“There are many kinds of clouds out there and there is not usually one special ‘Cloud SLA.’” explains Michel Drescher, EGI.eu’s Technical Manager. “For instance during EGI we are providing an Infrastructure as a Service cloud platform. This is really opposite to what others are doing so we’re formulating template SLAs to make it easier for tiny communities to get adult and running.”

In other EGI cloud news, EGI.eu and a University of Messina supposing training for users of a EGI Federated Cloud during a Cloud Summer School Almere, from Jul 22-26, 2013. The march supposing students with hands-on knowledge on tangible resources located in a Czech Republic (CESnet) and in Spain (CESGA).

In a past, instruction had been formed on a simplified internal exam cloud, though this was a initial time that a secure prolongation cloud was employed in training exercises. Students ran their applications in a genuine secure federated cloud environment. EGI.eu skeleton to use this indication as a template for serve training sessions.

Leading a bid were Michel Drescher with EGI and Massimo Villari, highbrow during a University of Messina. Local support was supposing by a Windesheim University and Genias Benelux.

“For us this is a step towards Cloud 2.0. where all is most easier to set up,” reported Massimo Villari.

“For EGI.eu this was a really good experience, removing out of a comfort section and not usually yield services to scientists, though also to tutors. we also schooled a lot from operative with a students that brought in some uninformed ideas,” pronounced Michel Drescher.

An interview with these plan leads is accessible on YouTube.

Article source: http://www.hpcwire.com/hpcwire/2013-08-28/egi_cloud:_slas_and_summer_school.html

Union Solutions takes secure managed hosting downstream to SMBs

Friday, August 31st, 2012

Datacentre formation dilettante Union Solutions has launched an enterprise-class managed hosting use for SMBs.

Its HostPoint charity aims to yield a secure managed hosting sourroundings for business-critical systems and applications.

The use is delivered from Union Solutions’ datacentres to despotic Service Level Agreements, that a association claims provides guaranteed performance, trustworthiness and scalability for particular SMB needs.

Speaking to Cloud Pro, Jason Rabbets, Union Solutions’ co-founder and handling director, said: “SMBs are underneath a lot of vigour currently, coping with a extended retrogression nonetheless being relied on to be a engine of recovery.  This means they need to `stick to their knitting` and concentration on a competitiveness of their products and services and not be dreaming by handling their IT infrastructure.”

With HostPoint, Union Solutions promises 99.9 percent availability, giveaway enterprise-class daily backups, giveaway backup riposte to a second Union Solutions information centre, customary disaster liberation and ISO 27001 and PCI DSS agreeable solutions.

“By rising Hostpoint, Union Solutions is ensuring…SMBs have entrance to an affordable hosting use finish with a infrastructure, support and government formerly customarily accessible for enterprises, complete with giveaway offsite backup, a requirement customarily charged for by other cloud providers,” Rabbets added.

SMBs also have an choice to use an ‘application on-demand’ charging model, permitting any organization to squeeze hosting resources on an as indispensable basis. “Because they are profitable for a use only like a utility, they do not have to foresee hosting mandate adult to 12 months in advance, another cause that will assistance them not only tarry though thrive,” he concluded.

Article source: http://www.cloudpro.co.uk/iaas/cloud-hosting/4463/union-solutions-takes-secure-managed-hosting-downstream-smbs

FIT4Green Project Claims Substantial Datacenter Power Reduction

Tuesday, July 3rd, 2012

July 3 – FIT4Green –project strong in anticipating new solutions for saving appetite in information centres. The plan designed and implemented an energy-aware plug-in on tip of a stream information centres’ government collection to harmonise a allocation of ICT resources and branch off new equipment. Project achieved a goal: 20 % approach ICT apparatus appetite assets but compromising correspondence with Service Level Agreements (SLA) and Quality of Service (QoS) metrics. The achieved assets in CO2emissions were on a same scale as in energy. The approach appetite assets in a ICT apparatus satisfy also conspicuous additional assets due to a reduced needs for cooling, for example.

FIT4Green plug-in is designed to be germane to any information centre type. The plug-in was certified in 3 deputy information centres: service/enterprise portal during ENI, supercomputing information centre during Jülich Supercomputing Centre with a federated site during VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, and cloud computing height during HP. VTT’s work in a plan strong on a optimizations in a supercomputing scenario. The aim of 20% was reached in any exam bed, and in some cases a assets were even adult to 50%. The comparison indicate for all a assets was a same complement but any appetite optimizations.

All a 16 open deliverables of a plan are openly accessible on a plan web site at http://www.fit4green.eu. The plug-in formula has also been expelled as open source software.

FIT4Green was concurrent by GFI Informática with HP Italy Innovation Centre as a technological leader. Other partners besides VTT were University of Passau, Jülich Supercomputing Centre, Imperial College London, University of Mannheim, Create-Net, Eni S.p.A., and Almende BV.

—–

Source: FIT4Green

Article source: http://www.hpcwire.com/hpcwire/2012-07-03/fit4green_project_claims_substantial_datacenter_power_reduction.html

The Best SLA Ever

Monday, March 5th, 2012

This post is partial of a ReadWriteCloud channel, that is dedicated to covering virtualization and cloud computing. The channel is sponsored by Intel and VMware. Read a box investigate about how Intel Xeon processors and VMware helped virtualize 12 business vicious database applications.

singlehop-logo.jpgYou no doubt are rather asocial about use turn agreements (SLAs), those little-reviewed papers that guarantee a turn of use from your hosting provider. Little-read that is, until something goes awry. Enter SingleHop, a Chicago-based provider that is perplexing to make a name for itself by indeed delivering a solid “Bill of Rights” for customers and earnest to compensate when they don’t accommodate their SLA. It is an engaging idea.

There are lots of other providers that do offer payouts for missed use milestones, of course. But we favourite a approach they are creation it easy to see their metrics and what we will get when they are off. Take a demeanour during a screenshot below:
sla2.jpg

For example, if we have to wait some-more than 3 hours to spin adult a dedicated server, we can take 10% credit on your subsequent bill. (Like that piggybank icon? A good touch.) Or wait some-more than an hour to a initial responder to your difficulty ticket? Take 5% off. One of a facilities singular to their Bill of Rights is a news card-like functionality that allows SingleHop’s business to see how good their comment is being handled. The minute news shows use annals as they review to a company’s guidelines.

SingleHop has dual opposite SLA tiers: a unchanging SLA (where we took a screenshot) and an extended SLA that has faster guarantees and aloft credits. All support requests from SingleHop are rubbed by American employees, and an tangible worker and not partial of a call center. Now that is bringing a new turn of use too.

Posted in

and tagged with

You no doubt are rather asocial about use turn agreements (SLAs), those little-reviewed papers that guarantee a turn of use from your hosting provider. Little-read that is, until something goes awry. Enter SingleHop, a Chicago-based provider that is perplexing to make a name for itself by indeed delivering a solid “Bill of Rights” for customers and earnest to compensate when they don’t accommodate their SLA. It is an engaging idea.
Please capacitate JavaScript to perspective a comments powered by Disqus.

Article source: http://www.readwriteweb.com/cloud/2012/03/the-best-sla-ever.php

Symantec fends off VMware for information centre throne

Wednesday, October 5th, 2011

Symantec Vision Symantec is favourable a Storage and Availability Management program (SAMG) for a virtualised cloud universe with a recover of chronicle 6.

The association is pulling a multi-vendor certification and aims to accelerate a software’s purpose in security, accessibility and storage government in information centres. However, it faces dual challenges: incoming foe from VMware and expanding storage array controller functionality. With this latest SAMG revision, Symantec is observant we can emanate a non-trivial cloud use regulating a infrastructure we already have.

The products updated in a SAMG 6 launch are:

  • Veritas Storage Foundation 6.0
  • Veritas Cluster Server 6.0
  • Veritas Operations Manager 4.1
  • Symantec ApplicationHA 6.0
  • Veritas Dynamic Multi-Pathing 6.0
  • Veritas Cluster File System 6.0
  • Veritas Replicator 6.0
  • Symantec VirtualStore 6.0
  • Veritas Storage Foundation for Windows 6.0
  • Veritas Storage Foundation for Oracle RAC 6.0
  • Veritas Storage Foundation for Sybase ACE 6.0

Veritas Operations Manager 4.1 breaks a 6.0 nomenclature; that’s odd, maybe there’s some-more to come there.

The upgraded program should cope a lot improved with multi-tiered applications that yield a business service, and safeguard a insurance and accessibility of practical business services (VBS). This should be probable opposite opposite handling systems and virtualisation regimes, with a VBS encapsulating a multi-tier business app set adult as a singular entity:

Administrators can design to harmonise a start, stop, non-disruptive testing, and failover of whole multi-tier applications with a singular click.

Symantec says that, handling in this way, it can assistance a business accommodate cloud use turn agreements (SLAs) as they muster private, hybrid and open clouds. With Veritas Operations Manager and Veritas Cluster Server installations, business are betrothed a perspective of accessibility and disaster liberation standing opposite a information centre from a singular monitor.

In other difference Symantec is staking a explain to be a information centre’s operations government apparatus and not ceding that purpose to pretender VMware.

The Veritas Storage Foundation (VSF) apartment is dictated to work opposite a multi-vendor environment, to grow and cringe provisioned storage in genuine time, optimise a use of array capacity, and capacitate multi-vendor storage choice. VSF has support for “thin reclamation, storage tiering, energetic resizing, and intelligent migration”.

Storage Foundation 6.0 is designed to support deduplication and focus during a record complement layer. We don’t know if it will pierce to retard storage as well. Symantec says: “The Veritas Storage Foundation apartment includes Veritas Dynamic Multi-Pathing, Veritas Cluster File System, and Symantec VirtualStore, with support for all vital storage arrays and handling complement platforms.”

In a approach Storage Foundation is an enabler of commoditised storage and Symantec is pulling a summary that what enterpriser array controller program does it can do with typical arrays.

Symantec is staking a explain to be a information centre’s operations government apparatus and not ceding that purpose to pretender VMware.

The v6.0 program introduces a new pay-for-what-you-use pricing model.

The gymnasium for a keynote event announcing this things was filled with happy, smiling people, and because not? They’d paid their assemblage price and got news of a comprehensive, opposite a house program refurbish assisting them lift on doing what they are already doing: facing a summons songs of single-source vendors like VMware, EMC and NetApp.

There was good news on a confidence front too with a raft of announcements. One prominence was a phenomenon of focus repute management. This involves a database of some 3.1 billion applications. If we pointer adult for this and your complement tries to run an app that’s not in a database afterwards it’s suggested to we that we don’t run it.

We’re meditative of this as a quasi-industry-wide whitelist facility. CEO Enrique Salem was flattering gratified with a idea. So was his audience, and Symantec’s repute went adult a nick as a result. ®

Article source: http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2011/10/05/symantec_samg_6_launch/

vSphere 5′s Storage DRS and storage form duty broach control over storage resources

Saturday, September 24th, 2011

The recover of VMware Inc.’s vSphere 5
brings many sparkling new facilities and enhancements to a virtualization platform, generally when
it comes to storage. Two of a biggest new facilities in that area are Storage Distributed Resource
Scheduler (DRS) and Profile-Driven Storage, that yield some much-needed control over storage
resources.

In prior versions of vSphere, Distributed Resource Scheduler
balanced VM workloads formed on CPU and memory apparatus utilization. Storage
DRS
extends this capability to storage, enabling intelligent VM initial chain and load
balancing formed on storage I/O and ability conditions within a cluster. Profile-Driven Storage,
for a part, ensures that VMs are placed on storage tiers formed on service-level
agreements
(SLAs), availability, opening and capabilities of a underlying storage
platform. In this tip, we’ll examine


both Storage DRS and a storage form functionality in
detail.

Storage DRS

Similar to a normal DRS feature, Storage DRS uses a new form of cluster called a data
store cluster, that is a collection of information stores that are many-sided into a singular territory of
consumption. By determining all of a storage resources, Storage DRS allows intelligent placement
of VMs that are powered on, as good as a changeable of workloads from one storage apparatus to
another when indispensable to safeguard best opening and equivocate I/O bottlenecks. What this means in
simpler terms is that, identical to vMotion’s
movement of VMs from horde to host, VMs can now be changed from information store to information store as well; the
decision to pierce a VM from one information store to another is done by Storage DRS, that tells Storage vMotion to
make a move.

Data store clusters are combined by going to a Datastores and Datastore Clusters intent in the
Inventory territory of a vSphere
Client
and right-clicking on a information core and selecting a New Datastore Cluster option. This
will launch a sorceress that allows we to configure a cluster and conclude automation settings.

At a initial screen, name a cluster and select possibly to capacitate Storage DRS or not. Then
choose an automation turn for Storage DRS—either primer mode, where it creates recommendations but
does not act on them, or full programmed mode, where VM hoop files are automatically moved. Then
define a runtime manners for Storage DRS, that mention how it operates. You can select to include
I/O metrics as partial of Storage DRS recommendations or not. If we do not embody them, only
utilized space is factored in. You can also conclude a thresholds for both employed space and I/O
latency. Utilized space can be set from 50% to 100%; this environment dictates a smallest turn of
consumed space that is a threshold for action. The default is 80%; with that setting, if a data
store has some-more than 20% giveaway space, no movement is taken. I/O latency can be set from 5 milliseconds
(msec) to 50 msec; this dictates a smallest I/O throughput indispensable to take action. The default is
15 msec, that means during slightest 15 msec of I/O latency contingency be occurring before movement is taken.

There are also modernized settings where we can conclude a disproportion that contingency start between the
source and finish information store for movement to occur. For example, if a threshold is set to 5
and if a space used on a source information store is 82% and on a finish information store it’s 79%,
Storage DRS will not make emigration recommendations from a source information store to a destination
data store. You can also conclude how mostly vCenter Server
re-evaluates I/O workloads. The default is 8 hours, that is not really frequent. The
re-evaluation can be set in minutes, hours or days. Finally, there is an I/O imbalance environment that
performs migrations usually when a I/O bucket imbalance exceeds a threshold.

Once we conclude your Storage DRS runtime settings, we afterwards select that hosts to embody in the
cluster as good as that information stores, and afterwards we are prepared to start regulating Storage DRS.

One vicious underline for determining Storage DRS function is anti-affinity rules. These are
used to safeguard that specific VMs or specific practical disks do not finish adult on a same information store
together. There are certain situations when we wish to keep VMs apart—for example, if we have two
heavy I/O database servers regulating on apart VMs, we might not wish both those workloads thrashing
the same information store. Another is for error toleration reasons: If we have dual VMs of that during least
one contingency sojourn running, by gripping them on apart information stores, we can safeguard that if one data
store fails, one of a VMs will continue to run.

While Storage DRS is a good feature, we should be clever with it and make certain we do not set
it too aggressively. A Storage vMotion charge is really I/O-intensive. If too many start during a same
time, opening can suffer. This emanate can be during slightest rather mitigated by a use of a
storage array that provides duplicate offloads for Storage vMotion so horde resources are not consumed
when they occur. And it’s best to initial use Storage DRS in primer mode before we try automated
mode, to guard recommendations and get a feel for what will occur.

Profile-Driven Storage

Profile-Driven Storage enables we to safeguard that VMs are stored on inclination that have specific
characteristics, such as certain capacity, availability, opening and excess levels. For
example, if we have a vicious VM that requires high storage performance, we can make certain that
it uses usually Fibre Channel information stores instead of iSCSI information stores.

There are dual components to this feature: storage capabilities and VM form documents. Storage
capabilities can be possibly system-defined or user-defined. System-defined capabilities are
automatically populated by storage arrays that support a new vStorage APIs for Storage Awareness
(VASA). Using VASA, a storage array can tell vCenter Server a capabilities, such as which
features it supports, opening characteristics, redundancy, capacity, etc. vCenter Server
assigns a system-defined storage capability to any information store that we emanate from that storage
system. If a storage array does not support VASA, we can still manually conclude capabilities for a
storage device. You can afterwards associate user-defined capabilities to a information store. You can associate
a user-defined capability with a information store that already has a system-defined capability. But a
data store can have usually one system-defined and usually one user-defined capability during a time.Once you
have storage capabilities defined, we afterwards emanate VM storage profiles from among all a storage
capabilities that are available. These profiles are used during provisioning, cloning and Storage
vMotion to safeguard that usually those information stores or information store clusters that are agreeable with the
virtual appurtenance storage form are done available.

Once we have profiles created, we can afterwards allot them to a VM by right-clicking on a VM and
selecting a VM Storage Profile choice and selecting Manage Profiles. You can also revise the
settings of a VM, and on a Profiles add-on we can allot profiles to a VM and a practical disks
(.vmdk). A VM’s application files (.vmx, .vmsd, .nvram, .log, etc.) and a practical disks can have
separate VM storage profiles. Once profiles are enabled and reserved to VMs, we can afterwards check
whether a VM and a practical disks are regulating information stores that accommodate a correspondence that is set in
the VM storage profile. In a VM Storage Profiles territory of a vSphere Client, we can
configure, capacitate and check a correspondence standing of VMs. For noncompliant VMs, we can select to
migrate them to a information store that will prove compliance.

Eric Siebert is a VMware consultant and author of dual books on virtualization.

This was initial published in Sep 2011

Article source: http://www.pheedcontent.com/click.phdo?i=d7f8bffd24255c50081fa64c41ce9c56

Cloud word sees misty future

Tuesday, September 20th, 2011

Service-level agreements (SLAs) per to cloud-computing services are now extensive adequate for any use disruption, records an attention analyst. One word vendor, however, says that cloud-specific word services can be complementary, and offer many marketplace potential.

Chris Morris, investigate executive of cloud technologies and services during IDC Asia Pacific, questioned a need for cloud word packages, observant that given a resources are owned by a cloud use provider, it is adult to this provider to recompense any detriment of income to business in a eventuality of a use interruption.

The researcher told ZDNet Asia that opposite IT applications rely, to varying extents, on outwardly sourced cloud computing services. If a cloud use is elementary and clearly defined, such as a simple infrastructure as a use for non-critical focus hosting, Morris pronounced that penalties settled in customary SLAs should be sufficient, and do not need additional insurance.

For some-more formidable and business-critical deployments, in that a use is delivered by mixed providers, such as telcos and server providers, he pronounced that a responsibility here is on a focus owners to entirely know a impact on their business if there is a detriment to a service.

“If it is that vicious to a delay of income for a business user, afterwards a risk criticism will brand this, and a governance cabinet will insist on business word to be carried by [the cloud vendor],” combined a IDC analyst.

Difficulties in risk assessment

Asked about a stipulations of putting together an word package for cloud-based services, Morris reiterated that many problems arise from a inlet of cloud services, and how mixed vendors are endangered in a smoothness process.

He remarkable that unless a singular businessman agrees to take on a lead provider purpose in such contracts, risk criticism of a cloud use will be “difficult”, and a word reward is doubtful to be competitive. Conversely, if a singular businessman can control a whole use smoothness supply chain, it would afterwards be some-more unsentimental for a third-party word services provider to yield word for it, creation a word package some-more appealing to intensity customers, he said.

Morris remarkable that in many cases, a chastisement payments charity by cloud use providers did not simulate a intensity for mislaid income incurred by influenced customers. In such cases, where a business risk was large adequate to aver coverage, companies should afterwards demeanour into purchasing a applicable policies.

That said, he combined that a “downside” to this choice was that cloud services were corroborated by usually a brief lane record for a smoothness of vicious business services. In a deficiency of explanation of delivery, a premiums for insurances to vicious services competence be so costly as to be unaffordable, a researcher surmised.

Insuring data, not service

However, Meghan Hannes, handling executive during cloud word provider CloudInsure, that was started in Aug 2010, pronounced that a association is holding a opposite proceed to cloud word than what Morris described.

Hannes told ZDNet Asia in a phone talk that rather than yield coverage for a cloud use per se, CloudInsure is conceptualizing a policies for “cyber liability”, that includes aspects such as regulatory coverage, information remoteness and security. In other words, it assesses a risks associated to a form of information that a association is exposing with cloud-based services, she explained.

Additionally, she pronounced that a company’s products — approaching to be accessible in a fourth entertain of this year or a initial entertain of 2012 — would “not interfere” with existent SLAs. Rather, a word would support these agreements and “starts where a SLAs finish off”.

According to CloudInsure’s website, it now lists 6 cloud providers in a initial pool of cloud services it rates. These are Amazon Web Services (AWS), NetSuite, Oracle, Salesforce.com, Intuit and SuccessFactors. How CloudInsure does a rating, though, stays underneath a non-disclosure agreement, Hannes said.

Quizzed on either CloudInsure was a initial to offer such word services, she replied that it was. Elaborating, she concurred that there were already existent cyber guilt services that support to a detriment of information on a internet or corporate websites. However, a marketplace for such services assumes that a infrastructure is owned by a company, since CloudInsure takes a position that a infrastructure providing a cloud services is not owned by a customers, she explained.

With regards to how a association labelled a word premiums, Hannes suggested that this was still in a “development phase”, though a running element would be “pricing risk according to a value of a information being insured”, that she pronounced reflected “true mercantile loss” in times of use disruption.

She forked out that industries where there were “regulated data”, such as medical and financial services, would be one of a “first movers” in terms of adopting such word policies, as these organisations faced some-more mercantile guilt for a information they placed on cloud services. As such, Hannes pronounced that there was a “tremendous volume of untapped potential”, where cloud word was concerned, and a marketplace could be value anything in a millions to billions range.

One cloud use provider that ZDNet Asia spoke to, per a viability of cloud word products, chose not to criticism on a doubt directly. Instead, Amazon Web Services’ orator Regina Tan said: “We will continue to listen to business on what is many critical to them with courtesy to SLAs, and will always cruise ways in that we can raise a charity for customers.”

Tan combined that cloud computing reinforces some aged concepts of building rarely scalable internet architectures, while introducing some new concepts that change a approach applications are built and deployed. As such, companies looking to precedence a full advantages of a cloud, including a agility and scalability, need to initial know a services, facilities and best practices, she suggested.

In April, AWS suffered a prejudiced disaster to a Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) during a northern Virginia site, that brought down important sites such as Quora and Reddit. Its Dublin, Ireland, EC2 site also gifted downtime final month, following an “explosion that caused a transitory electric deviation” and disabling some of a energy synchronisation systems, according to a report by record site Data Center Knowledge.

Via ZDNet Asia

Article source: http://www.zdnet.com.au/cloud-insurance-sees-hazy-future-339322676.htm